logologologologo
  • Areas of Practice
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Business, Corporate, Real Estate Law
    • Divorce, Custody and Family Law
    • Employment Law
    • Probate and Estate
    • Serious Accident and Injury Lawsuits
  • Our Attorneys
    • Robert J. Behal
    • Jack D`Aurora
    • John M. Gonzales
    • Gilbert J. Gradisar
    • Jeffrey A. Eyerman
    • DeAnna J. Duvall
    • Sarah K. Myer
  • About
    • Location
    • Cases We’ve Handled
    • Legal Fees
    • Testimonials
  • News and Information
  • Contact
✕

Giant Eagle Escapes Liability for Scooter Driver’s Negligence

  • Home
  • News and Information
  • Uncategorized
  • Giant Eagle Escapes Liability for Scooter Driver’s Negligence
September 28, 2019
Jane Fonda

What happens if you’re in a grocery store, and you’re struck by someone driving one of those motorized scooter shopping carts the stores make available for customers, and you’re injured? The Ohio Supreme Court recently told us you won’t be able to recover from the grocery store for your injuries.

Giant Eagle was sued by Barbara Rieger after she was hit by Ruth Kurka. Rieger was standing in line for baked goods, and Kurka was driving one of those motorized scooter shopping carts. Based on her injuries, the jury awarded Reiger over $360,000, finding Giant Eagle liable because it makes the scooters available to anyone, without evaluating a customer’s ability to safely use one and without providing any instruction. The Ohio Supreme Court overturned the verdict.

The court held that Reiger had failed to establish causation. That is, no evidence was presented as to how Giant Eagle’s failure to provide training had contributed to the collision. What may have been significant for the court was that Kurka had safely used the scooters for over a year.

[Reiger v. Giant Eagle, 2019-Ohio-3745, decided Sept. 19, 2019.]

Share

Related posts

DAuroraSimonYaoStudio arms crossed reduced scaled e1648673236962
September 10, 2023

Jack D’Aurora successful in civil rights action


Read more
April 20, 2022

Seitz, LaRose, Paduchik attacks on O’Connor undermine justice


Read more
contract
October 25, 2020

Exceptions to the “no-oral modification” provision in a contract


Read more

Search

✕

Categories

  • Cases We’ve Handled
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • DAuroraSimonYaoStudio arms crossed reduced scaled e1648673236962
    Jack D’Aurora successful in civil rights action
    September 10, 2023
  • Trial court required to conduct hearing for wrongfully convicted client
    November 12, 2022
  • Seitz, LaRose, Paduchik attacks on O’Connor undermine justice
    April 20, 2022
  • DAuroraSimonYaoStudio arms crossed reduced scaled e1648673236962
    Law denies justice to woman raped repeatedly as a child
    March 30, 2022
  • COVID 19 Back to the workplace
    COVID-19 poses litigation exposure for employers
    November 16, 2020

Areas of Practice

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Business, Corporate, Real Estate Law
  • Divorce, Custody and Family Law
  • Employment Law
  • Probate and Estate
  • Serious Accident and Injury Lawsuits

Recent News and Information

  • Jack D’Aurora successful in civil rights action
  • Trial court required to conduct hearing for wrongfully convicted client
  • Seitz, LaRose, Paduchik attacks on O’Connor undermine justice
  • Law denies justice to woman raped repeatedly as a child
  • COVID-19 poses litigation exposure for employers

Behal Law © 2025 | Designed by SiteInSight