logologologologo
  • Areas of Practice
    • Commercial Litigation
    • Business, Corporate, Real Estate Law
    • Divorce, Custody and Family Law
    • Employment Law
    • Probate and Estate
    • Serious Accident and Injury Lawsuits
  • Our Attorneys
    • Robert J. Behal
    • Jack D`Aurora
    • John M. Gonzales
    • Gilbert J. Gradisar
    • Jeffrey A. Eyerman
    • DeAnna J. Duvall
    • Sarah K. Myer
  • About
    • Location
    • Cases We’ve Handled
    • Legal Fees
    • Testimonials
  • News and Information
  • Contact
✕

Not All Speech on Social Media is Protected

  • Home
  • News and Information
  • News
  • Not All Speech on Social Media is Protected
November 7, 2014

The rise of social media has dramatically changed the way most of us communicate. These changes have affected free speech regarding what is protected under the law and what isn’t. This can become especially tricky when it comes to businesses and their employees. The following information discusses what types of speech is protected on social media and what is not.

What Is Protected?

Many companies have social media policies that urge employees not to discuss company matters online or talk about managers or co-workers in a negative light. Many of these policies are murky, and some may even be illegal. According to the Institute for Public Relations, the National Labor Relations Board has been involved in striking down workplace social media policies that prohibit employees from discussing topics such as wages, unions and management issues. In general, speech is also protected if it involves a public concern.

What’s Not Protected?

In short, anything that would be defined as threats, harassment or obvious insubordination is not protected. Deciding when an employee has gone from simply airing workplace complaints to crossing a line that involves illegal speech is not always easy to determine. A lot of laws regarding stalking and harassment were written before many aspects of our lives moved online. The courts are now starting to catch up, and there are a few recent cases that may affect what’s no longer protected as free speech online.

In the case of Ames v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction, an employee posted statements on Facebook regarding shooting other employees. The employee was eventually terminated. In the case of the

Richmond District Neighborhood Center, an after school teen center in San Francisco, declined to send rehire letters to two employees based on their Facebook conversations. The conversations referred to specific acts of insubordination. While these two cases have proven there are times when speech on social media crosses the line and is no longer protected, employers need to carefully evaluate each specific situation and even seek out legal advice before taking action.

Share

Related posts

November 12, 2022

Trial court required to conduct hearing for wrongfully convicted client


Read more
DAuroraSimonYaoStudio arms crossed reduced scaled e1648673236962
March 30, 2022

Law denies justice to woman raped repeatedly as a child


Read more
COVID 19 Back to the workplace
November 16, 2020

COVID-19 poses litigation exposure for employers


Read more

Search

✕

Categories

  • Cases We’ve Handled
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • DAuroraSimonYaoStudio arms crossed reduced scaled e1648673236962
    Jack D’Aurora successful in civil rights action
    September 10, 2023
  • Trial court required to conduct hearing for wrongfully convicted client
    November 12, 2022
  • Seitz, LaRose, Paduchik attacks on O’Connor undermine justice
    April 20, 2022
  • DAuroraSimonYaoStudio arms crossed reduced scaled e1648673236962
    Law denies justice to woman raped repeatedly as a child
    March 30, 2022
  • COVID 19 Back to the workplace
    COVID-19 poses litigation exposure for employers
    November 16, 2020

Areas of Practice

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Business, Corporate, Real Estate Law
  • Divorce, Custody and Family Law
  • Employment Law
  • Probate and Estate
  • Serious Accident and Injury Lawsuits

Recent News and Information

  • Jack D’Aurora successful in civil rights action
  • Trial court required to conduct hearing for wrongfully convicted client
  • Seitz, LaRose, Paduchik attacks on O’Connor undermine justice
  • Law denies justice to woman raped repeatedly as a child
  • COVID-19 poses litigation exposure for employers

Behal Law © 2025 | Designed by SiteInSight